Re: Elephant in the room - Akamai

[Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>]

> On Dec 8, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net> wrote:
>
> I guess what I'm getting at is that it sounds like, if you cannot source the content locally to the peering link, 
> there's not likely to be an internal connection to the same site from somewhere else within the Akamai network to 
> deliver that content and, instead, the target network should expect it to come in over the "public Internet" via some 
> other connection.  Is that accurate?
>
> Thanks for the clarifications.

<personal hat fully on>

I was hired at Akamai to design the network architecture for a global backbone.  This is proving to be an interesting 
challenge taking a diverse set of products with various requirements and interconnecting them in a way that saves costs 
and improves performance while my employers traffic continue to grow.

<personal hat off>

<work hat on>

Akamai is built to use the paths available to deliver traffic and meet our customers and our business goals.  Not all 
our sites are interconnected and it’s extremely unlikely (read: possibly never, but who knows) you will see all your 
traffic come over a direct link or cache.  With any sufficiently complex system, plus the acquisitions we have made 
over my short tenure it’s almost impractical to integrate them all quickly or possibly at all.

I personally want to make sure that we deliver the traffic in a way that makes sense, and a few people have seen those 
efforts but there’s also many things in progress that are not yet complete or ready for public consumption.  I believe 
there’s room here to improve and each time we can turn a switch or dial a knob to better serve our customers and the 
end-users that we are paid to serve, everyone wins.  
<work hat off>

Enterprises vs consumer ISPs have very different traffic profiles, and I think the genesis of this thread was a direct 
result of a very consumer oriented traffic profile that was unexpected.  People have wondered why I would spend so much 
time watching things like Apple rumor websites in the past, it’s because that would lead to high traffic events.  You 
go to where the data is.  The same can be said for other large download events or OTT launches.  Everyone knows a live 
event can be big but generally bound by the target audience size.  

As software is attacked within minutes or hours after security patches are released, I don’t find it surprising these 
days that systems automatically download whatever they can the moment it’s released from gaming consoles to IoT and 
server and OS patches.

If the traffic is causing you pain, I encourage you to reach out so we can look at what might be improved.

- Jared
(I swear I’ll stop responding.. off to make lunch)