Re: RIPE our of IPv4

[bzs () theworld com]

This is that reasoning that because this particular shiny bauble is
laying right here on the table then that's the whole picture.

More likely if some of them decided to sell that IPv4 block they'd
catch up on the rent or cut deductibles on the health care plan or or
get rid of some of that 100mb ethernet or something.

IPv6 would be way, way down on that list.

That's how small businesses run.

On November 30, 2019 at 19:54 lists.nanog () monmotha net (Brandon Martin) wrote:
> On 11/30/19 4:48 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> > See previous message about legacy IPv4 holders without budget for IPv6 blocks 
>
> How slim are your margins to have been around long enough to have a legacy IPv4 block but not be able to afford the 
> ARIN fees to get a comparable/very usable (/48 to /52 for each IPv4) amount of IPv6?  And if you don't need a 
> "comparable" amount of IPv6, presumably you aren't using all your legacy IPv4 and can sell off part of its 
> presumably huge allocation to get some funds.
> -- 
> Brandon Martin

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs () TheWorld com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*