nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links
From: James Jun <james.jun () towardex com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:58:39 -0400
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 09:13:30AM -0400, Ross Tajvar wrote:
"company-ic" and "company-gw" are commonly used names for /30s used for interconnection to a customer or another carrier. Those routers are likely owned/managed by Telia/Verizon.
I highly doubt VZ or Telia owns and provides a Big Expensive Router as CPE sitting on US landing POP for a major international carrier. More likely, thease routers are China Unicom's routers in their US POP, not managed by VZ/Telia. The /30s in this case are unmanaged IP transit hand-offs, coming in as Nx10G or 100G. When your IP transit provider assigns the /30, your router looks like it belongs to your upstream, common mistake when interpreting traceroutes[1]. [1]: see Page 22 on https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Sunday/RAS_Traceroute_N47_Sun.pdf James
Current thread:
- Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 16)
- Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links Ross Tajvar (Apr 16)
- Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links James Jun (Apr 16)
- Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links Christopher Morrow (Apr 16)
- Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links Ross Tajvar (Apr 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links Christopher Morrow (Apr 16)
- Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 16)
- Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links James Jun (Apr 16)
- Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links Pengxiong Zhu (Apr 16)
- Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links Ross Tajvar (Apr 16)