nanog mailing list archives
Re: Segment Routing
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 16:43:01 +0300
On 22 May 2018 at 11:19, Matt Geary <matt.geary () gmail com> wrote:
really seeing the value of SR to replace LDP on my backbone. With some scripting and lots of software tools I can make it just like LDP, but why? So break the ease of LDP just to get label switching on my hub core not really seeing it, unless someone has done it and they are seeing the value.
Can you elaborate what scripting and software tools are needed? If you'd talk about RSVP particularly AutoBW and SR, then yeah, but SR on itself should be less of a chore than LDP. SR is what MPLS was intended to be day1, it just wasn't very marketable idea to sell MPLS and sell need for changing all the IGPs as well. LDP is added state, added signalling, added complexity with reduced visibility. SR is like full-mesh LDP (everyone has everyone's label POV), while also removing one protocol entirely. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Segment Routing, (continued)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing steve ulrich (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing steve ulrich (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing steve ulrich (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Scott Whyte (May 22)