RE: BGP in a containers

[Michel Py <michel.py () tsisemi com>]

> Mike Hammett wrote :
> I wonder which part of the proposal people find offensive.

The intent of the original post was vague. Like a lot of people, I would not run a full BGP router in a container. Now, 
if the purpose is to inject or learn a handful of routes in order to do limited host routing, I can see the need.
A route-server or a looking glass in a container would be fine, or something to perform analysis on the routing table, 
but not anything that has to route actual traffic.

I use ExaBGP to inject routes, perfect tool for that. If routes have to be received (not my use case) it makes more 
sense, as stated by previous posts, to use Quagga or BIRD.
Which one is better : easy : if you like Cisco better, use Quagga. If you like Juniper better, use BIRD :P

BIRD looking glass looks very good ;-)

Hope this makes sense.
Michel.



TSI Disclaimer:  This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above and 
contain information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not 
forward, copy, use or otherwise disclose this communication or the information contained herein. In the event you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and then delete all 
copies of it from your system. Thank you!...