nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP in a containers
From: "Oliver O'Boyle" <oliver.oboyle () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:40:01 -0400
There's no reason why it shouldn't work well. It's just a minor paradigm shift that requires some solid testing and knowhow on the ops team. On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 22:26 Eric Tykwinski, <eric-list () truenet com> wrote:
The funny part is I don’t like containers but love VMs, so kvm, vmware, citrix, hvm, et al. Not much difference but I tend to like the separation of OS knowledge, with all the bugs lately though I wonder if it’s worth it. Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300On Jun 14, 2018, at 10:14 PM, Hunter Fuller <hf0002+nanog () uah edu>wrote:On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:46 PM Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:I wonder which part of the proposal people find offensive.I have no idea. All - You know no one is trying to make *you* run BGP inside of a container, right?
Current thread:
- Re: BGP in a containers, (continued)
- Re: BGP in a containers Michael Thomas (Jun 14)
- Re: BGP in a containers Raymond Burkholder (Jun 15)
- Re: BGP in a containers Hugo Slabbert (Jun 15)
- Re: BGP in a containers Jimmy Hess (Jun 15)
- Re: BGP in a containers Hugo Slabbert (Jun 18)
- Re: BGP in a containers Jeff Walter (Jun 18)
- Re: BGP in a containers Doug Clements (Jun 18)
- Re: BGP in a containers Michael Thomas (Jun 14)
- Re: BGP in a containers Hunter Fuller (Jun 14)
- Re: BGP in a containers Eric Tykwinski (Jun 14)
- Re: BGP in a containers Oliver O'Boyle (Jun 14)
- Re: BGP in a containers Christopher Morrow (Jun 14)
- Re: BGP in a containers Pete Lumbis (Jun 15)