nanog mailing list archives
Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 21:56:34 +0200
On 14/Jul/18 14:04, Job Snijders wrote:
I actually view it as a competitive advantage to carry a cleaner set of routes compared to the providers with a more permissive (or lack of) filtering strategy. Sometimes less is more.
Typically, I wouldn't disagree. In practice, most customers only care about reachability, and not their contribution to the Internet hygiene. A case of "They will look after it", where "they" is not "me". Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation, (continued)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- RE: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Michel Py (Jul 19)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Mark Tinka (Jul 19)
- Message not available
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Job Snijders (Jul 27)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Alex Band (Jul 27)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Mark Tinka (Jul 13)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Mark Tinka (Jul 13)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Mark Tinka (Jul 13)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Job Snijders (Jul 14)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Saku Ytti (Jul 14)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Mark Tinka (Jul 14)
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Mark Tinka (Jul 19)