nanog mailing list archives
Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX
From: Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 10:39:42 +0800
The other point to consider is that a NFP can justify more locations and offer services (such as extended reach) that don’t have the same profit margins or ROI as for-profits. This often leads to greater value to those with smaller networks and fewer customers allowing them to grow and expand without increased aggregation or transit costs. This in-turn leads to a richer array of providers and chips away at the monopolies in niche markets. The NFP IXP I work for focuses on providing value to the broader community and the Internet as a whole - especially somewhere like Australia which has unique constraints. Additionally, “Neutral” and For-Profit doesn’t always compute in my mind, there will always be commercial alliances that lead to not-total neutrality. When a NFP is owned by it’s members there has to be 100% transparency in organisational decisions around member funds and resources which ensures accountability reliability. - Tim
On 21 Dec 2018, at 3:58 am, Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote: On 12/20/2018 12:51 PM, Aaron wrote:Probably price. Also perception of value. If you're a for profit enterprise then they're paying for interconnection plus your bump. If you're non-profit the perception is that there is a larger value because there's no bump. Whether that's true or not, who knows but that's the perception I've heard.Depending on the size of the non-profit, I'd almost compare it to how the hospitals are here in Boise. The non-profits are oversized, monopolistic, price gouging, etc. Their care can be pretty meh, esp since they bought up all the little independent clinics (yay, ER pricing for a basic family clinic visit). The for-profit smaller clinics and hospitals run a pretty tight ship, better value for their money, service is very good, and compete with one another for who has the best service. People think they are getting 'better' because they are going to a place that is supposed to be run to benefit people over profit, but alas, you'd be very very wrong. -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
Current thread:
- Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mike Hammett (Dec 20)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Aaron (Dec 20)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Brielle Bruns (Dec 20)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Tim Raphael (Dec 20)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Clayton Zekelman (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mehmet Akcin (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Darin Steffl (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Jay Hanke (Dec 21)
- RE: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Robert DeVita (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Brielle Bruns (Dec 20)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Aaron (Dec 20)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Jason Lixfeld (Dec 21)