nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:04:02 +0200
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:54:34AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> wrote a message of 10 lines which said:
Watch what you wish for: you might get it. The number of attack/abuse vectors (and the severity of their consequences for security and privacy) involved in doing auto-update may rival those involved in not doing auto-update.
Also, there is the risk of getting updates that will disable some features, if there is a change in the commercial strategy of the vendor <https://boingboing.net/2016/09/19/hp-detonates-its-timebomb-pri.html>. All these risks are documented in RFC 8240, a highly recommended reading.
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? William Waites (Apr 02)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Colin Johnston (Apr 02)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Paul Ebersman (Apr 02)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? sthaug (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Paul Ebersman (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Paul Ebersman (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 03)