nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:29:48 +0200 (CEST)
This also ignores the shift if every house in the world did its own recursion. TLD servers and auth servers all over the world would have to massively up their capacity to cope.With my TLD operator hat, I tend to say it is not a problem, we already have a lot of extra capacity, to handle dDoS.As long as ISPs don't actually disallow running of recursive serversThat would be a terrible violation of network neutrality. I hope that such ISP will go bankrupt.
With my ISP hat on: I see no problem with this as long as the resolver is not open to the Internet. There are unfortunately plenty of home user equipment with an open DNS proxy (probably also some resolvers). This *will* be misused. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Aftab Siddiqui (Apr 01)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Baldur Norddahl (Apr 02)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Apr 02)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? William Waites (Apr 02)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Colin Johnston (Apr 02)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Paul Ebersman (Apr 02)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? sthaug (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Paul Ebersman (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Paul Ebersman (Apr 03)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 03)