nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:55:46 -0400
On Sep 11, 2017, at 3:35 AM, Nikolay Shopik <shopik+lists () nvcube net> wrote: On 10/09/2017 14:25, Saku Ytti wrote:However I don't think market would generally appreciate the implications linklocal brings to traceroute, where least bad option would be just to originate hop-limit exceeded from loop0, with no visibility on actual interface.rfc5837 would help but it seems market universally ignore it for some reason unknown to me (lack of interest and IPv6 adoption?) We find LL is simpler, operation wise at some cases.
How’s that work out for you on routers with the same MAC address on multiple interfaces when you’re trying to troubleshoot ECMP trace routes? Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Nick Hilliard (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Enno Rey (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Job Snijders (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Enno Rey (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Enno Rey (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation sthaug (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Nick Hilliard (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Saku Ytti (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Enno Rey (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Nikolay Shopik (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Owen DeLong (Sep 11)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Owen DeLong (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Saku Ytti (Sep 12)