Re: AS36040 Prefix Limits

[Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>]

It is in conjunction with a route server. The filtering I meant would be that network A wants the IX to drop all 
advertisements to them from network B. Normally solved by network B putting a community on their routes to not 
advertise to network A, but network B doesn't want to do one-off configs. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Andy Davidson" <andy () nosignal org> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> 
Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog () nanog org> 
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:20:08 AM 
Subject: Re: AS36040 Prefix Limits 

Hi, Mike 

On 18/10/2017, 18:39, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote: 

> I am looking for someone that can speak authoritatively regarding AS36040's 
> ability to change their own prefix limits, prefix filtering, etc. 
> My current contact is advising the IX to do the filtering for them, which 
> is not something IXes should be doing. 

Unless this is in conjunction with a multilateral peering session (“route-server”), when prefix-filtering is something 
that the IXP very much should be doing. 

Andy