nanog mailing list archives
ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have
From: "Aaron Gould" <aaron1 () gvtc com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 11:51:19 -0600
This is a *single area* ospf environment, that has been stable for years.. But now suddenly is having issues with new ospf neightbor adjacencies , which are riding a 3rd party transport network Anyone ever experienced anything strange with underlying transport network mtu possibly causing ospf neighbor adjacency to be broken ? I'm asking if the underlying 3rd party transport layer 2 network has a smaller mtu than the endpoint ospf ip interface have, could this cause those ospf neighbors to not fully establish ? .and I'm also asking this if the single ospf area has grown large enough to cause some sort of initial database packet to be larger than that underlying 3rd party mtu is providing -Aaron
Current thread:
- ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have Aaron Gould (Nov 22)
- Re: ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have Jay Hennigan (Nov 22)
- RE: ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have Richard Vander Reyden via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have Rafael Ganascim (Nov 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have Scott Weeks (Nov 27)