nanog mailing list archives
Re: Broadcast television in an IP world
From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 21:25:58 -0700
Where the content is increasingly becoming on-demand, no, multicast isn't going to benefit folks that much. The delivery is going to pretty much remain single-stream based strictly on the time differential from one user's start point to the next even if they are both watching the same episode. So local broadcasters can benefit, yes, but the problem is that content consumption is moving rapidly away from the schedule-based paradigm. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 06:56:38PM -0500, shawn wilson wrote:
Besides Netflix, does anyone else offer CDN boxes for their services? I'm also guessing that most content won't benefit from multicast to homes too much? I can see where multicast benefits sports and news (and probably catching commercials for people). But in a world where I'm more than happy to pay Amazon $25-40 a show/season to avoid commercials, I'm guessing live/broadcast TV will get even less popular (I get news via YouTube - so that's not even live for me anymore). On Nov 17, 2017 18:03, "Luke Guillory" <lguillory () reservetele com> wrote:This use to be the case. While it might lower OPX that surely won't result in lower retrans, will just be more profit for them. We're down as well on video subs, this is 99% due to rising prices. This is where it's heading for sure, in the end it will cost more as well since each will be charging more than the per sub rates we're getting charge. They'll have to in order to keep revenue the same. When ESPN offers an OTT product I have no doubt it will be near the $20 per month, for 5 channels or so? Luke Guillory Vice President ??? Technology and Innovation Tel: 985.536.1212 Fax: 985.536.0300 Email: lguillory () reservetele com Reserve Telecommunications 100 RTC Dr Reserve, LA 70084 ____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________ Disclaimer: The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate, distribute or be copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. .
--- Wayne Bouchard web () typo org Network Dude http://www.typo.org/~web/
Current thread:
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world, (continued)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Mike Hammett (Nov 21)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 17)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Jameson, Daniel (Nov 17)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jay Farrell via NANOG (Nov 17)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 17)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world shawn wilson (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Wayne Bouchard (Nov 18)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 17)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Matthew Black (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Matthew Black (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Matthew Black (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Seth Mattinen (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Tom Carter (Nov 21)