nanog mailing list archives
Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 07:06:32 +0900
This sounds something like the MEF Third Network type stuff.... I mean the ability to setup connection dynamically across network boundaries on-the-fly, via an ordering system... that has always sounded awesome to me... and I've wondered how we could actually get there one day.
to me, this was the dream of optical switching and gmpls (which is not mpls) randy
Current thread:
- Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Pedro de Botelho Marcos (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Nick Hilliard (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Christopher Morrow (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Aaron Gould (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Keith Medcalf (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Keith Medcalf (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Aaron Gould (May 24)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Nick Hilliard (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic LHC (k9m) (May 23)