nanog mailing list archives
Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 20:02:20 +0100
Pedro de Botelho Marcos wrote:
The current approach for establishing agreements is cumbersome, typically requiring lengthy discussions.
i'm not sure the available data supports this conclusion:
http://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/download/0/6574-2016-survey-of-internet-carrier-intercon_0.pdf
which notes:
Of the total analyzed agreements, 1,347 (0.07%) were formalized in written contracts. This is down from 0.49% in 2011. The remaining 1,934,166 (99.93%) were “handshake” agreements in which the parties agreed to informal or commonly understood terms without creating a written document.
Nick
Current thread:
- Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Pedro de Botelho Marcos (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Nick Hilliard (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Christopher Morrow (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Aaron Gould (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Keith Medcalf (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Keith Medcalf (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Aaron Gould (May 24)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Nick Hilliard (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic LHC (k9m) (May 23)