nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:08:44 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote:
To make it short : education. And we as as small ISP we have neither the resources, nor the motivation (because $$$ on the issue is negative) to do it (the education).
An ISP should be an enabler, and have a service portfolio to cover most customers need. Not all customers will want all the services, so if a customer doesn't want IPv6 then fine, turn it off for them. When they come back later and want it, they know you have it.
You've done your part, and that's great! -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- IPv6 traffic percentages? Bajpai, Vaibhav (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 18)
- RE: IPv6 traffic percentages? Aaron Gould (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv6 traffic percentages? fhr (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv6 traffic percentages? Aaron Gould (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Mukom Akong T. (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Lee Howard (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Rod Beck (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jima (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 18)