![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?
From: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog () radu-adrian feurdean net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:00:50 +0200
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017, at 08:18, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
On 18 June 2017 at 17:36, Radu-Adrian Feurdean <nanog@radu- adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:>> so for the record, business customers are much more active in*rejecting* IPv6, either explictely (they say they want it disabled) or>> implicitly (they install their own router, not configured for IPv6). The>> bigger the business, the bigger the chance of rejection.Did they per chance state their reasons for rejecting it?
Not explicitly. But when we get something like "turn off that IPv6 crap !" we take it for: - they don't have a clearly defined need for it - they don't know how to deal with it - they don't want to deal with things they don't need (see the irst point)... usually all of them at the same time. To make it short : education. And we as as small ISP we have neither the resources, nor the motivation (because $$$ on the issue is negative) to do it (the education). -- R-A.F.
Current thread:
- IPv6 traffic percentages? Bajpai, Vaibhav (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 18)
- RE: IPv6 traffic percentages? Aaron Gould (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv6 traffic percentages? fhr (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv6 traffic percentages? Aaron Gould (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Mukom Akong T. (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Lee Howard (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Rod Beck (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jima (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 18)