nanog mailing list archives

Re: Russian diplomats lingering near fiber optic cables


From: Gordon Cook <cook () cookreport com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 14:59:30 -0400

I have just scanned this whole thread - it is the most amazing analysis of technical details I have e ver seen

national security also
sean I am taking this in the sense of what the hell could these russian diplomats be doing?

I have been a nanog reader  since this list began   in the spring of 1995 i believe

remember i am parsing comments from the russian side as well
 
 i met aleksei soldatov at the kurchatov institute for the first time in april 1992.  about 3 days earlier i met  the 
demos guys who  told soldatov   suggested to soldatov that  he  should met me  at kurchatov 

I followed the development of the russian internet very closely between April 1992 and 1999  not much after that.

meanwhile i am
well aware of international fiber optic cables geographic issues of same  — see telegeography for example,  His 
coordinates etc
 interception  of cable via submarine etc

see the US Sub named Jimmy  carter

I visited Russia for the first time in 1964  
my dissertation completed in 1972

dis on site work for the Phd in Russia for 2 months summer of 1970
including pushkinskii Dom

Thanks to steve Goldstein of NSF I received an invite to attend the second Nato sponsored conference on the future e of 
  the  russian internet  met larry land weber there at Golitsyno - the conf  was sept 30 to Oct 2 1994 

The point?  I have long experience with my Cook Report on Internet Protocol  in April 1992 issue #1

and an even lon\ger experience  with russian history language and culture 

 I am also well aware this message will be readable by a ver large number of people both  here and abroad.

even visited the westin bldg In i think 1994.
 take a bow Sean!!

:-)



On Jun 11, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Gordon Cook <cook () cookreport com> wrote:

Hi Sean

You and I first met when i was at OIA about 1992   LOONG TIME ago

Always thought  of you as brilliant collector of info as well as analyst there of 

this question of yours is absolutely brilliant

look at the responses (more) than 45!!!






On Jun 1, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote:


There must be a perfectly logical explanation....  Yes, people in the industry know where the choke points are. But 
the choke points aren't always the most obvious places. Its kinda a weird for diplomats to show up there.

On the other hand, I've been a fiber optic tourist.  I've visited many critical choke points in the USA and other 
countries, and even took selfies :-)


http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/01/russia-spies-espionage-trump-239003

In the throes of the 2016 campaign, the FBI found itself with an escalating problem: Russian diplomats, whose travel 
was supposed to be tracked by the State Department, were going missing.

The diplomats, widely assumed to be intelligence operatives, would eventually turn up in odd places, often in 
middle-of-nowhere USA. One was found on a beach, nowhere near where he was supposed to be. In one particularly 
bizarre case, relayed by a U.S. intelligence official, another turned up wandering around in the middle of the 
desert. Interestingly, both seemed to be lingering where underground fiber-optic cables tend to run.

According to another U.S. intelligence official, “They find these guys driving around in circles in Kansas. It’s a 
pretty aggressive effort.”

It’s a trend that has led intelligence officials to conclude that the Kremlin is waging a quiet effort to map the 
United States’ telecommunications infrastructure, perhaps preparing for an opportunity to disrupt it.





Current thread: