nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP peering question
From: Tore Anderson <tore () fud no>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:13:56 +0200
* craig washington
Newbie question, what criteria do you look for when you decide that you want to peer with someone or if you will accept peering with someone from an ISP point of view.
Routing hygiene. I expect the would-be peer to keep the number of advertised routes that are either 1) not registered in RIPE/RADB, 2) disaggregated, or 3) redundant (i.e., more-specifics of larger advertisements) to an absolute minimum. Tore
Current thread:
- Re: BGP peering question, (continued)
- Re: BGP peering question Nick Hilliard (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Wolfgang Tremmel (Jul 12)
- Re: BGP peering question David Hofstee (Jul 12)
- Re: BGP peering question cyrus ramirez via NANOG (Jul 12)
- Re: BGP peering question Nick Hilliard (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Bob Evans (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Ethan E. Dee (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question William Herrin (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question craig washington (Jul 14)
- Re: BGP peering question Owen DeLong (Jul 13)
- Re: BGP peering question H I Baysal (Jul 14)