nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP peering question
From: Opeyemi via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:18:10 -0400
Okay I will just throw this, in addition to what the others have said. From an ISP point of view, assuming the neighbor is able to provision their end of the cross-connect, you need to check the common POP cost requirements, and also consider if the neighbor is willing to either pay for the peering or provide a mutual benefit. Payment is straight forward. Mutual benefit will depend on what you desire from the neighbor-ship; secure IPv6, Transit services, latency and capacity thresholds, route and path attribute requirements, responsiveness to collaboration over issues (abuse, outages, and instability), internetwork politics, and other BGP controls. Opeyemi Olomola
On Jul 10, 2017, at 4:12 PM, craig washington <craigwashington01 () hotmail com> wrote: Newbie question, what criteria do you look for when you decide that you want to peer with someone or if you will accept peering with someone from an ISP point of view.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP peering question, (continued)
- Re: BGP peering question Ethan E. Dee (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question William Herrin (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question craig washington (Jul 14)
- Re: BGP peering question Owen DeLong (Jul 13)
- Re: BGP peering question H I Baysal (Jul 14)