nanog mailing list archives
Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:53:46 -0500
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Matthew Huff <mhuff () ox com> wrote:
Please check the nanog archives. I was just responding to the argument that a /64 is wasteful and serves little purpose.
Then respond. With explanation, reasoning and evidence. Telling me to search a massive archive for nebulous discussions is a total cop-out. Regards, Bill -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Current thread:
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment, (continued)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Sander Steffann (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Michael Still (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Michael Still (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- RE: Questions on IPv6 deployment Matthew Huff (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Owen DeLong (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment joel jaeggli (Jan 17)
- RE: Questions on IPv6 deployment Matthew Huff (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Sander Steffann (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Michael Still (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)