![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:55:35 -0500
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Huff <mhuff () ox com> wrote:
The reason for allocating a /64 for a point to point link is due to various denial of service attack vectors.
Hi Matthew, I'm always interested in learning something new. Please explain the DOS vectors you're referring to and how they're mitigated by allocating a /64 to the point to point link.
Just do it.
No. But if you offer a good reason, I'll factor your reason in to my considerations. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Current thread:
- Questions on IPv6 deployment Matthew Crocker (Jan 16)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Chris Russell (Jan 16)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Sander Steffann (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Michael Still (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Michael Still (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- RE: Questions on IPv6 deployment Matthew Huff (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Owen DeLong (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment joel jaeggli (Jan 17)
- RE: Questions on IPv6 deployment Matthew Huff (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Sander Steffann (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment Michael Still (Jan 17)