nanog mailing list archives
Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:59:15 -0500
On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:41:57 -0500, "Chuck Church" said:
If we'd just put a stake in the ground and say residences can have one router and bridge everything below that we'd be further ahead. I just can't see 99.999% of users being interested in subnetting their homes and writing firewall rules so their light bulbs can't talking to their DVRs.
So you'd rather write firewall rules so that people using your "guest" side of the *bridged* network stay out of the *other* side of the *bridged* network? (Hint: What does "bridged" mean for where packets go?) If you have the ability to set up multiple subnets, it's easy: Subnet 0 is wired local ports on the back of the router Subnet 1 is your local 2.4ghz wireless Subnet 2 is your local 5ghz Subnet 3 is your guest 2.4 Subnet 4 is your guest 5ghz. Subnets 0 1 and 2 can talk to each other, Subnets 3 and 4 can only talk to the outside world. Probably want a few more subnets for all the crapware that's shipping as part of the Internet of Pwned Things. Or you can try to do all this in one bridged subnet. Have fun with your nervous breakdown. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too, (continued)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Ricky Beam (Dec 28)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Keith Medcalf (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Tony Wicks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Chuck Church (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Michael Crapse (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too John Lightfoot (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 29)
- Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Octavio Alvarez (Dec 28)
- Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Dec 28)
- Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too bzs (Dec 28)