nanog mailing list archives
RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too
From: "Tony Wicks" <tony () wicks co nz>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 16:28:20 +1300
I think its time you all had a bit of a holiday break and stopped thinking of IP networking for a little while, Just saying.......
Current thread:
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too, (continued)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Ricky Beam (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too William Herrin (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Ricky Beam (Dec 28)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Keith Medcalf (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Tony Wicks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Chuck Church (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Michael Crapse (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too John Lightfoot (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 29)
- Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Octavio Alvarez (Dec 28)