nanog mailing list archives
Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 19:14:51 -0500
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:15:44 -0500, Joe Maimon said:
There is plenty more to wonder about, for example, will the rest of the unicast space get Class E'd?
That's a non-starter, as pretty much all the gear out there has code that says 'Class E is reserved" (including gear that's *already* doing production IPv6). If you're going to upgrade everything *anyhow*, deploying IPv6 has better bang for the buck than Class E support.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too, (continued)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Keith Medcalf (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too William Herrin (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Jason Iannone (Dec 21)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too ops . lists (Dec 21)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Christopher Morrow (Dec 21)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Jima (Dec 22)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Jimmy Hess (Dec 21)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Joe Maimon (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too George Metz (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Joe Maimon (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Harald Koch (Dec 20)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Aaron Gould (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Saku Ytti (Dec 20)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Aaron Gould (Dec 21)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Aaron Gould (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lee Howard (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Jens Link (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Eric Kuhnke (Dec 20)