nanog mailing list archives
Re: Novice sysadmins
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:35:42 -0800
On 12/06/2017 09:27 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 12/6/17 09:16, Nate Metheny wrote:I've always been more than willing to share knowledge and skill trainingwith those who show interest and talent; the more qualified and interested people involved, the better, in my opinion. Making the club "exclusive" byrequiring thousands of dollars of training and testing is just another method of control and elitism.Is it elitism that professional engineers (structural, mechanical, civil, etc.) be educated with required experience as a junior engineer before they can take the PE exam?
The internet has done pretty well without a guild thus far. The onus for regulation should be on the wannabe-guild builders.
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: Novice sysadmins, (continued)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Michael Thomas (Dec 05)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 05)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Sam Oduor (Dec 05)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Miles Fidelman (Dec 05)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Tim Pozar (Dec 05)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Rich Kulawiec (Dec 06)
- RE: Novice sysadmins Keith Medcalf (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Filip Hruska (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Nate Metheny (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Seth Mattinen (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Michael Thomas (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Stephen Satchell (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Leo Bicknell (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Harald Koch (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Chuck Anderson (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins William Herrin (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Sam Oduor (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Miles Fidelman (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins Jason Hellenthal (Dec 06)
- Re: Novice sysadmins (was: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider) Leo Bicknell (Dec 05)
- Re: Novice sysadmins (was: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider) amuse (Dec 05)