nanog mailing list archives

Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:28:36 -0600 (CST)

I understand that most BGP implementations are single-threaded. 

The problem is that it sucks, which version 7 fixes... whenever the unicorn makes that delivery. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "mike lyon" <mike.lyon () gmail com> 
To: tony () wicks co nz 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 12:07:19 PM 
Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption 

Bad thing about the CCRs is that their BGP process is single threaded. So even though it has a bunch of cores, it 
doesn’t utilize them for BGP. 

-Mike 

On Dec 5, 2017, at 09:50, <tony () wicks co nz> <tony () wicks co nz> wrote: 

For me the obvious answer for the OP is the Mikrotik CCR range - https://mikrotik.com/product/CCR1036-8G-2Splus 



-----Original Message----- 
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke 
Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 6:00 AM 
To: nanog () nanog org list <nanog () nanog org> 
Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption 



Current thread: