nanog mailing list archives
Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM
From: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:44:27 -0700
On 11/30/2017 01:53 AM, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
DKIM is not widely used and DKIM does break a lot of mailinglists and sometimes also SRS compliant forwarding.
How does DKIM break SRS compliant forwarding? (Assuming that only the message envelope is modified.)
Or are you referring to DMARC's interactions there in? -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM, (continued)
- Re: lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Eric Kuhnke (Dec 01)
- RE: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Keith Medcalf (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Chuck Anderson (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John Levine (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John Levine (Dec 01)
- RE: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Keith Medcalf (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John Levine (Dec 01)