nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <mikevs () xs4all net>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:39:42 +0200
In article <xs4all.CAP032Tv1QtSOOEiL5K5yLQjM87bfvutvCQeqfsyzan4QAmH4mA () mail gmail com> you write:
What would it take to test for BCP38 for a specific AS?
Well, if a certain browser vendor let the browser deduce the external IP address, then send out a UDP DNS PTR query for <reverse-ip>.in-addr.browser-vendor.com to say, a large DNS resolving cluster they also happen to be running, from a random source address, once every so often, they could very quickly build up a name-and-shame list of providers that don't do proper filtering. Just saying. Mike.
Current thread:
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?, (continued)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 28)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Jones (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Joe Klein (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Alain Hebert (Sep 28)
- RE: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? White, Andrew (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Hammett (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Wesley George (Sep 28)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Hammett (Sep 28)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Nick Hilliard (Sep 28)