nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
From: "Zbyněk Pospíchal" <zbynek () dialtelecom cz>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:29:01 +0200
Dne 27.09.16 v 15:17 Mikael Abrahamsson napsal(a):
Hm, so the IX operator looks at packets at the IX (sFlow perhaps), see who is sending attack packets, and if they're spoofed, this ISP is then put in "quarantine", ie their IX port is basically now useless.
Definitely not. Try to read first instead of speculations. Regards, Zbynek
Current thread:
- BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Stephen Satchell (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 28)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mike Jones (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Joe Klein (Sep 27)
- Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"? Alain Hebert (Sep 28)