nanog mailing list archives
Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11
From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:39:52 -0600
Why would the provider want to do anything? They suuport (make money from) their cudtomers. And the more traffic the send/receive, the more money the providers make. Wouldn't surprise me if the providers were selling access to their customers networks to the botherders so they could make money from both ends. --- Sent from Samsung Mobile <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg () tristatelogic com> </div><div>Date:2016-10-23 17:20 (GMT-07:00) </div><div>To: </div><div>Cc: nanog () nanog org </div><div>Subject: Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 </div><div> </div>
Current thread:
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11, (continued)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 David Conrad (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Florian Weimer (Oct 23)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 22)
- FW: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Keith Medcalf (Oct 22)
- Re: FW: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 22)
- Re: FW: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Ronald F. Guilmette (Oct 23)
- Re: FW: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Scott Weeks (Oct 22)
- RE: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Keith Medcalf (Oct 22)
- RE: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Josh Reynolds (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Florian Weimer (Oct 23)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Keith Medcalf (Oct 23)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 23)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 jim deleskie (Oct 23)