nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?
From: Daniel Ankers <md1clv () md1clv com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 17:20:38 +0100
On 22 October 2016 at 16:40, marcel.duregards--- via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
What about BCP38+84 on 30 tier-1 instead of asking/hoping 55k others autonomous-system having good filters in place ?
The originating ISPs are in a far better position to check that traffic isn't from spoofed address ranges than transit networks are. The best thing to do is to ask EVERY network to do what they can, not just the few biggest ones. Any size ISP can be hit by and hurt by DDoS attacks, so every size ISP should be doing what they can to make sure they are not either the source or the victim of those attacks. Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?, (continued)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? David Hubbard (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Yang Yu (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Brian Davies via NANOG (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Alain Hebert (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Wayne Bouchard (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? George William Herbert (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Daniel Ankers (Oct 22)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Alain Hebert (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Jared Mauch (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Seth Mattinen (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Andrew Fried (Oct 21)