nanog mailing list archives

RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?


From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:20 +0000

Then it's mainly TCP slowstart that you're trying to improve?

Thanks,
Jakob.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale W. Carder [mailto:dwcarder () wisc edu]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 3:03 PM
To: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz () cisco com>
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?

Thus spake Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (jheitz () cisco com) on Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 09:29:44PM +0000:
What's driving the desire for larger packets?

In our little corner of the internet, it is to increase the performance
of a low number of high-bdp flows which are typically dataset transfers.
All of our non-commercial peers support 9k.

Dale


Current thread: