nanog mailing list archives
RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:20 +0000
Then it's mainly TCP slowstart that you're trying to improve? Thanks, Jakob.
-----Original Message----- From: Dale W. Carder [mailto:dwcarder () wisc edu] Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 3:03 PM To: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz () cisco com> Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Thus spake Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (jheitz () cisco com) on Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 09:29:44PM +0000:What's driving the desire for larger packets?In our little corner of the internet, it is to increase the performance of a low number of high-bdp flows which are typically dataset transfers. All of our non-commercial peers support 9k. Dale
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?, (continued)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Saku Ytti (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Nick Hilliard (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Dale W. Carder (Mar 18)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (Mar 18)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tim McKee (Mar 20)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (Mar 18)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tim McKee (Mar 20)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Chuck Church (Mar 21)