nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP and Optical domains?
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:45:54 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Mark Tinka wrote:
If you are deploying additional bandwidth just for protection, I hope you're my competitor.
So if you have a fiber break, you're not going to have enough overcapacity in your network to remain uncongested until this fiber break is fixed?
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- IP and Optical domains? Glen Kent (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Glen Kent (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 18)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)