nanog mailing list archives
Re: Monitoring system recommendation
From: Dan Lacey <daniel.p.lacey () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 11:30:38 -0600
Yes, but depends on HW. They support some pretty huge environments. You have to have "enough" IOPs to keep up with the polling, DB and RRD data. Then there will never be a "heavy" load...I would contact them and based on your needs ask them what HW you will need for your implementation. You can get real world info from the mailing list: https://sourceforge.net/p/opennms/mailman/
I would suggest the opennms-discuss list. On 6/8/16 4:39 PM, Jeff wrote:
On 06/06/2016 10:18 AM, Manuel MarĂn wrote:Dear Nanog community[...snipped...]Your input is really appreciated it Thank you and have a great day RegardsI have not used openNMS in production.. does it work well under heavy load? regards, J
Current thread:
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation, (continued)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Mark Felder (Jun 06)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Jeff Gehlbach (Jun 06)
- RE: Monitoring system recommendation Raymond Burkholder (Jun 06)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Matthew Pounsett (Jun 06)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Andrew Kirch (Jun 06)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Guillaume Tournat (Jun 06)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Mikael Falkvidd (Jun 07)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Crier, Brent (Jun 07)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Mike Hammett (Jun 07)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Jeff (Jun 09)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Dan Lacey (Jun 09)
- Re: Monitoring system recommendation Mark Felder (Jun 06)