nanog mailing list archives

RE: Monitoring system recommendation


From: "Raymond Burkholder" <ray () oneunified net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:17:51 -0300

We are currently planning to upgrade our monitoring system (Opsview) due
to scalability issues and I was wondering what do you recommend for
monitoring
5000 hosts and 35000 services. We would like to use a monitoring system that

Another consideration is check_mk.  We use it in our shop.  The check_mk people wrapped a bunch of python around the 
Nagios notification engine.  No longer do you need to worry about the tedium of nagios config files, those are all 
built automatically from commands from a gui or from a single configuration file.

Check_mk has a benchmarking page which scales to more hosts than you specified:
https://mathias-kettner.de/checkmk_checkmk_benchmarks.html

For an architecture diagram of how they use nagios for alerting, and python for scanning:
http://mathias-kettner.com/check_mk.html

If an included agent isn't available, new ones can be written.  

We are quite happy with the solution.  We've replaced cricket, cacti, nagios, observium, and a little bit of smokeping 
with this almost all in one tool.




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


Current thread: