nanog mailing list archives

Re: New ICANN registrant change process


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:23:04 -0400

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:

Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for
Registries to deauthorize registrars on the grounds of continuous streams
of complaints.


<devils advocate hat>
On what metric? Pure volume? Percent of registrations? type of complaint by
similar x/y?
</devils advocate hat>

there are 'lots of complaints' against some registrars, but if you have
~20% of the .TLD market you're prone to get more volume than a 1%er, right?
Also, this isn't REALLY the registrY's problem is it?

i love how icann makes avoiding blame so easy.


Current thread: