nanog mailing list archives
Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:30:51 -0600
On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk> wrote:On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman <mhardeman () ipifony com> wrote:Since Cogent is clearly the bad actor here (the burden being Cogent's to prove otherwise because HE is publicly on record as saying that theyd love to peer with Cogent)I'd like to peer with all tier 1's, they are thus all bad as they won't. HE decided they want to be transit free for v6 and set out on a campaign of providing free tunnels/transit/peering to establish this. Cogent, for all their faults, are free to not accept the offer. Can the Cogent bashing stop now, save it for when they do something properly bad. brandonSelling a service that is considered internet but does not deliver full internet access is generally considered properly bad. I would not do business with either company, since neither of them provide a full view. CB
I note that if IPv6 was actually important, neither one could have gotten away with it for so long. Matthew Kaufman (Sent from my iPhone)
Current thread:
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it, (continued)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Jared Mauch (Jan 25)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Justin Wilson (Jan 26)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it joel jaeggli (Jan 26)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Mark Tinka (Jan 26)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it jimmy keffer (Jan 27)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Job Snijders (Jan 27)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Matthew D. Hardeman (Jan 21)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Ca By (Jan 21)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Matthew Kaufman (Jan 21)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Matthew D. Hardeman (Jan 21)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Christopher Morrow (Jan 21)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it jim deleskie (Jan 22)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Mike Hammett (Jan 22)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Constantine A. Murenin (Jan 22)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Matthew D. Hardeman (Jan 22)
- Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Matthew D. Hardeman (Jan 22)