nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:48:19 +0900
jokes aside, Its a hypothesis worth testing. It has qualities which make it plausible. So please, between you, find a way to specify and test it!
although the hypothesis has some intuitive appeal, how to test it is far from obvious. and i note that, as a senior member of the measurement community, you're saying "you guys do it." thanks a lot. :) i considered rtt from a service such as goog to their querriers. there are the problems of their distributed caches, the politics of getting their data, and the eyeball bias. maybe find a platform with less of those biases. dns is far too biased in all sorts of dimensions. your add clicks? i have found no usable coffee here in nagoya, so i may be missing something obvious. randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jared Mauch (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? nanog-isp (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jared Mauch (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Owen DeLong (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? nanog-isp (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jared Mauch (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Owen DeLong (Jan 20)