nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?
From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:31:32 +0100
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:13:41PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
I propose the following axiom: the greater the distance over which a packet is forwarded, the less likely it is to be an IPv6 packet.that is a hypothesis not an axiom [...]
Thanks.
but an interesting hypothesis. how do you propose to test it?
We could assert that the TTL is an indication of distance traveled. Maybe one should record the TTL and Address Family of all packets received from the internet ('inbound') at the next NANOG or IETF? Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- IPv6 traffic percentages? nanog-isp (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jared Mauch (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? nanog-isp (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jared Mauch (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Owen DeLong (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? nanog-isp (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jared Mauch (Jan 20)