nanog mailing list archives

Re: PCH Peering Paper


From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:56:14 +0100

* bedard.phil () gmail com (Phil Bedard) [Sat 13 Feb 2016, 01:40 CET]:
I was going to ask the same thing, since even for settlement free peering between large content providers and eyeball networks there are written agreements in place. I would have no clue on the volume percentage but it's not going to be near 99%.

It's much closer to 99% than to 50%, though.


        -- Niels.


Current thread: