nanog mailing list archives
Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:07:57 +0200
On 4/Apr/16 14:58, Christopher Morrow wrote:
so (as bill points out) plan to localize subnets to each pop. (do not number customers in pop1 in the same /24 as customers in pop2)
Yes. May lead to some global de-aggregation, but can't really avoid that.
be aware of gre / ip-in-ip forwarding limitations
I wouldn't touch it, myself. I'd rather devote the sleepless nights to fixing the backhaul.
different providers, different entrance facilities in the building(s), different conduits out of the area... and hope that somewhere along the path providerA and B didn't share conduit or capacity-swap you to a single path :)
+1. Mark.
Current thread:
- Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk magicboiz () hotmail com (Apr 03)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk Christopher Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk Mark Tinka (Apr 04)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk magicboiz () hotmail com (Apr 04)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk Christopher Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk Mark Tinka (Apr 04)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk joel jaeggli (Apr 05)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk Christopher Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk Hank Nussbacher (Apr 04)
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk Scott Weeks (Apr 04)