nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:17:16 -0700
Sure, but in that latter case, it is not link-local only. It doesn’t matter where the /n (where n is (preferably) a member of {64, 126, 127}) for the point-to-point link is issued, so long as there is a GUA on the link. Owen
On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:51 , Clinton Work <clinton () scripty com> wrote: Granted that having the CPE request both a IA_NA and IA_PD is a more common configuration. Some of the CPEs using only DHCPv6 PD can allocate a /64 out of the delegated /48 for WAN address & management. The IPV6 traceroute is not broken with the DHCPv6 PD only configuration. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:Sure, but this is a useless savings that comes at the cost of awkward traceroute output that will initially confuse your new employees and consistently confuse your customers.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Baldur Norddahl (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Clinton Work (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Clinton Work (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Bjørn Mork (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Mark Tinka (Sep 09)