nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments
From: Clinton Work <clinton () scripty com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:51:33 -0600
Granted that having the CPE request both a IA_NA and IA_PD is a more common configuration. Some of the CPEs using only DHCPv6 PD can allocate a /64 out of the delegated /48 for WAN address & management. The IPV6 traceroute is not broken with the DHCPv6 PD only configuration. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Sure, but this is a useless savings that comes at the cost of awkward traceroute output that will initially confuse your new employees and consistently confuse your customers.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Matthew Kaufman (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Baldur Norddahl (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Clinton Work (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Clinton Work (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Bjørn Mork (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Mark Tinka (Sep 09)