nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Irony.


From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:18:46 -0700

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Yucong Sun <sunyucong () gmail com> wrote:

I don't understand the strategy here, how is that getting more traffic
going-through IPv6 help its adoption by the mass?  IMHO it only helps
high-end, backbone type of network equipment producers sell more of
their big box with advanced IPv6 license.  It has absolutely no help
with the long tail crowd, which really need more push and incentive to
support ipv6.

Cheers.


Which "big box" has an "advanced IPv6 license"?


CB


Current thread: