nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Irony.
From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:22:10 -0700
On 10/13/2015 02:56 AM, Max Tulyev wrote:
So upgrade hardware and network admins are NOT sufficient for IPv6 adoption;)
Was that a typo? Didn't you have to upgrade your network admins, too? <g,d&r>
Current thread:
- IPv6 Irony. Donn Lasher (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Ca By (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Max Tulyev (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Stephen Satchell (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Max Tulyev (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Paul S. (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Yucong Sun (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Ca By (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Max Tulyev (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Rinse Kloek (Oct 20)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Sander Steffann (Oct 20)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Ca By (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Masataka Ohta (Oct 20)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Mark Andrews (Oct 20)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Masataka Ohta (Oct 21)
- RE: IPv6 Irony. Nicholas Warren (Oct 22)