nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:57:43 -0400
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:17:14AM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
So even when they give an avenue to resolve the issue, people still complain... *sigh*
"Handing over more information" to unrepentant, chronic, systemic spammers (who also happen to be engaged in massive abuse of the DMCA) is not in any sense a "resolution". ---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance, (continued)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Eric Kuhnke (Oct 10)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Eric Kuhnke (Oct 10)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Matthew Black (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Fred Hollis (Oct 09)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Seth Arnold (Oct 12)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bjørn Mork (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Mike Hammett (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Baldur Norddahl (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bjørn Mork (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Fred Hollis (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance seth (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bob Evans (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Peter Kristolaitis (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Jason Hellenthal (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Stephen Satchell (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 14)