nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:35:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Christopher Morrow wrote:
fairly certian that nothing ip-echelon sends is ever valid... or there's enough 'clearly you are joking' mail from them that anyone who ends up in court for 'ip echelon violations' could simply subpeona their isp for 'other complaints from ip echelon' and show the judge: "Clearly these folk are on the good crack, case closed due to reasonable doubt."
procmailrc is your friend. however far your lawyer lets you go.
Current thread:
- IP-Echelon Compliance Baldur Norddahl (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Theodore Baschak (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Eric Kuhnke (Oct 10)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Eric Kuhnke (Oct 10)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Matthew Black (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Fred Hollis (Oct 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Seth Arnold (Oct 12)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bjørn Mork (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Mike Hammett (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Baldur Norddahl (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bjørn Mork (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)