nanog mailing list archives

Re: bad announcement taxonomy


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:51:44 -0500

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:24:09 -0800, Arturo Servin said:

Well, if you take a route, change its origin as your own (or any other) and
re-announce it (perhaps just a smaller prefix of it) I would assume some
intent.

Or they are super whoopsies.

AS7007 was a whoopsie.  And in fact, I'll go out on a limb and say that
most, if not all, EGP->IGP->EGP re-injections are whoopsies.

Because let's face it, if you had *intent*, you'd just start announcing it.


Current thread: